Retrospective: the last 7 day(s), and what to do differently #296
Labels
No labels
agent
agent:ci
agent:done
agent:failed
agent:needs-input
agent:refined
agent:refining
agent:running
agent:shipped
agent:skip
autonomous
autopilot
driven
local
plan
proposal
qa
qa-gap
research
retro
ship
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
jeroen/cartopolis#296
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Step back and read the last 7 day(s) of this lane, then steer it. You are not building anything on this ticket.
The maintainer has set a focus for this lane, so judge the period against it as well
as against the values — including whether the plan under it is still the right queue:
docs/direction.md(the goal and the seven values); every issue closed orfiled in the last 7 day(s) — shipped, failed, parked — and the reports on closed
qatickets. All of it is on the Forgejo API with theFORGEJO_TOKENin yourenvironment. What the lane's queue already holds is not readable from here — its
config file is on the pipeline host — so propose what the period argues for and let
the autopilot drop the repeats; it matches on the slug of your title and says so.
which was busywork? Where did tickets stall, and is the pattern a machinery problem
(conflicts, refusals, flakes) rather than a hard ticket? What do the QA findings say
players keep hitting? Is the frontier still the highest-value queue, or is the gap
backlog now worth more than the next data source?
ticket only for work that is about to be built, and everything below is a proposal
until the maintainer keeps it.
ticket, as exactly this block:
docs/direction.mdhere: the direction is the maintainer's, by that file's ownfirst rule. A proposal is a paragraph they read, not a row that becomes a ticket.
qa-gapissues into the build lane. Nine of those tickets were open, none of them labelled
for the lane to build, and the board they filled is the thing that stopped it
filing anything at all.
Autopilot log— the lane's daily thread, which is where the maintainer reads it, andthe one place a finding of yours survives being deleted from the queue. The period in
five lines, what you posted to the queue, what you propose and why. Then close this
ticket through the API.
Decide it yourself. Nobody is watching this ticket. Judge by the seven values; a
promotion you are unsure about is one to leave for the maintainer, not to ask about.
Filed by the autopilot.
🤖 Picked this up — working on branch
feat/296-retrospective-last-7-dayin a fresh worktree on the VPS. I'll report back here when I'm done.Label an issue
agent:skipto keep me off it, ordrivento keep it in a session you are driving.Read the period against
docs/direction.mdand the seven values. Three thingsdecide what I am proposing.
The lane built eight commits that never reached
main. Seven branches are aheadof
maintoday —feat/214-nav-marks-readout,fix/232-crossing-clearance-from-rails,fix/268-floating-marks-water-level,fix/219-autopilot-docs-only-deploy,fix/281-autopilot-page-issue-lists,ci/290-flicker-smoke-headroom,perf/237-reanchor-skips-an-unmoved-anchor— each carrying work this lane finished andreported done, and every one of their tickets was closed on 2026-09-09. Each was parked
with a sentence addressed to a person ("rebase, resolve, push, and put the
shiplabelback") in a lane whose whole premise is that there is no person. That is the largest
pool of finished value on the board, and none of it needs a new idea.
Every build failure in the period was the 45-minute session limit. #288, #289 and
#293 — including item 1 of this lane's own queue — each died with "No commits were made".
Not a conflict, not a flake, not a hard ticket: a wall, hit three times, leaving nothing
behind and nobody to retry.
The gap backlog outvalues the next data source, and it was deleted rather than worked.
34
qa-gaptickets and nine machinery findings were closed on 2026-09-09. Several weremeasured, cheap and player-facing; four of them are rows below.
Rows 1–7 are machinery and land under
tools/, so they are built and parked for review.Rows 8–11 are the measured gaps worth rescuing. Nothing here touches the wire protocol,
a migration,
assetlinks.jsonortools/autopilot.ts's fences — rows 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7do edit
autopilot.tsitself and are expected to land parked, not merged.Row 10 is the only one on the Steam Deck focus directly; the queue already holds ten
perf rows in flight and I have not repeated them.
This was a retrospective, not a build, so the branch has no commits and nothing was pushed.
What I found
I read
docs/direction.md, every issue filed or closed between 3 and 10 September, the QA reports, and the code behind each claim.The lane built eight commits that never reached
main. Seven branches are ahead ofmainright now — the nav-mark readout (#214), the crossing clearance fix (#232), the floating navigation marks (#268), two autopilot fixes (#219, #281), the flicker-smoke headroom (#290) and the re-anchor cost fix (#237). Every one was finished and reported done by this lane; every one was parked with a sentence asking a person to rebase it; every one of their tickets was closed on 9 September while the branch stood. That is the largest pool of finished value on the board.All three build failures in the period were the 45-minute session limit (#288, #289, #293 — including item 1 of the lane's own Steam Deck queue), each ending with "No commits were made".
Two machinery faults are live today, and I checked them rather than trusting the tickets:
autopilot.tsreads issue lists atlimit=100while the repository holds 112 issues, so dedupe keys are already expiring; and the daily note has not been posted since 3 September although the lane ticked on the 5th and the 9th.What I did
--framessweep, the cabinet prompt). Each note says where it lands and how a machine judges it.For you to decide
docs/direction.md. My argument: a source stays "Wired" only while a player can meet it, and aqa-gapagainst a wired source outranks the next candidate. #221 said this in August and was closed unbuilt.CARTO_QUALITY=steamdeckrung by name — which the #294 plan explicitly refused andc854c15superseded the same day with the measured governor. I did not re-file it; I think it should be dropped or narrowed to the one part that isn't a guess (the Deck takesdesktop(), which has no upload or residency ceiling at all)..forgejo/workflowshas one runner label,ubuntu-latest, so queue item 6 — the measurement everything after it is ordered behind — parks until someone runs it by hand.Nothing was verified by building, because nothing was built. The factual claims above come from the Forgejo API,
git, and reading the named source lines.No commits were made.
🤖 viberfox issue agent on the VPS — 53 turns · $5.61 · session
7d9ede53-3cae-4650-aa19-6e14f3e8e9cc. Reply with @agent to continue this session.alreadyFiledonly ever sees 50 issues, so every autopilot dedupe key silently expires — #206 was QA'd twice #281