main is red on 9e5ed895

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 08:46:33 +00:00

Collaborator

Problem

main at 9e5ed895 does not compile its test targets. The failing job is run 687, task 1075, job 1285; its log ends 🏁 Job failed after:

error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> crates/geo/src/crossings.rs:759:17
759 |             let (mast_h, road_half, reach) = kind.spec();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   ----------- this expression has type `(f32, f32)`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
   --> crates/geo/src/crossings.rs:813:13
error: could not compile `cartopolis_geo` (lib test) due to 2 previous errors

This is not a runner fault. It is a semantic merge conflict between two crossings branches that both passed on their own and were both cut from the same parent a76cbbe:

0a9836d (#273, "stand every level crossing's boom up") — raises the boom so its bands stack in y from BOOM_Y upward at a constant x beside the mast (crates/geo/src/crossings.rs:431-453), and adds the two tests at crossings.rs:752 and crossings.rs:811. Green as a branch head (run 680).
b2b9233 (#274, "size a level crossing for the road it bars") — splits CrossingKind::spec() from a 3-tuple into (mast_h, fallback_half) (crossings.rs:220-225) plus boom_span() -> Option<f32> (crossings.rs:237-243), and adds the across() measurement helper (crossings.rs:500-531) with four tests built on it. Green as a branch head (run 681).

git merge joins them cleanly — they touch different regions of one file — and the result does not type-check. cargo check would not have caught it either: per CLAUDE.md, check does not compile cfg(test) code, and both new tests live in #[cfg(test)] mod tests.

The two compile errors are not the whole failure. Once they are fixed, four tests will fail at runtime, because across() was written against the flat boom and now reads a raised one. across() picks the boom tip as the minimum x among vertices with 0.5 < y < 1.5 (crossings.rs:525-529). With the raised bar, every band sits at a constant boom_x = mx - side * (MAST_HALF_W + BOOM_HALF_FACE) (crossings.rs:442) and the lowest band's bottom face is at exactly BOOM_Y = 1.05 (crossings.rs:102, crossings.rs:444), which is inside that filter — so tip now measures a point ~0.24 m inboard of the mast rather than a reach across the road. The four affected assertions:

test	line	asserts	reads under the raised boom
`a_wide_road_gets_a_wide_crossing`	`crossings.rs:909`	tip ≈ 0.0 (centreline)	≈ 5.63
`a_narrow_road_gets_a_narrow_crossing`	`crossings.rs:943`	tip ≈ 0.0	≈ 1.47
`a_full_barrier_reaches_the_far_kerb`	`crossings.rs:957`	tip ≈ −5.5 (far kerb)	≈ 5.63
`an_unknown_width_falls_back_to_the_old_numbers`	`crossings.rs:979`	tip ≈ `mast_x − reach`	≈ `mast_x − 0.37`

(Those right-hand numbers are arithmetic off the cited constants, not measurements — the suite run under Verification is what settles them.)

Nothing outside the test module is broken: the only two CrossingKind::spec() call sites left in the tree are the two failing ones plus the correct crossings.rs:385, and furniture.rs:1055's spec() is a different type's method.

Approach

One crate, one file, test module only: crates/geo/src/crossings.rs — plus one prose line in docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md. No production code should change; both landed behaviours are intended and neither is being undone.

a_raised_boom_stands_clear_of_the_road (crossings.rs:752-804) — take the two-tuple and get the reach from boom_span(), the same way push_crossing does at crossings.rs:394-397:
```
let (mast_h, road_half) = kind.spec();
let reach = kind.boom_span().expect("a barrier form has a boom") * road_half + VERGE_M;
```
The rest of the test needs no change; it already measures the reach in y (crossings.rs:779-784). Its two hardcoded 0.5s (crossings.rs:789) are VERGE_M (crossings.rs:107) and are worth naming while the lines are being touched.
a_lights_crossing_is_two_masts_and_two_lamps (crossings.rs:811-843) — same two-tuple destructure, and move the no-boom claim to CrossingKind::Lights.boom_span().is_none(). The across = road_half + 0.5 + 0.30 at crossings.rs:831 likewise reads better as VERGE_M.
across() (crossings.rs:500-531) — its tip no longer describes anything. The reach is now a bar length, read as the boom bands' maximum y above BOOM_Y, which is the idiom a_raised_boom_stands_clear_of_the_road already uses at crossings.rs:768-771. Return that instead of a horizontal tip, and rewrite the helper's doc comment (crossings.rs:500-509) to say what it measures now. Keep the mast half of it unchanged — that part still reads correctly.
The four tests above — restate each assertion in terms of the bar's length rather than where its tip lands, preserving the numbers #274 pinned: for a form with boom_span() == s on a road of half-width h, the reach is s * h + VERGE_M. That is crossings.rs:227-236's own statement, and the fallback table at crossings.rs:969-975 (4.0 / 2.1 / 7.5 / none) carries over unchanged.
docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md:196-200 says a half barrier's boom "reaches back half + 0.5 so its tip meets the centreline". That is the lowered attitude, and the same file's line 223 says the booms stand raised. Make it a length ("the bar is half + 0.5 long, so it meets the centreline when lowered") so the two paragraphs stop contradicting each other.

Acceptance criteria

cargo test -p cartopolis_geo compiles and passes.
cargo test --locked --workspace --exclude cartopolis_android passes.
No CrossingKind::spec() call site destructures three elements: grep -n '\.spec()' crates/geo/src/crossings.rs shows only two-element bindings.
push_crossing (crossings.rs:384-455) and everything else outside #[cfg(test)] mod tests is byte-identical to 9e5ed895, except for the note edit — git diff main -- crates/geo/src/crossings.rs touches nothing above crossings.rs:484.
Both behaviours that landed are still asserted: a test fails if the boom is laid flat again, and a test fails if the installation stops being sized from LevelCrossing::road_half.
The fallback reaches stay 4.0 / 2.1 / 7.5 m and the no-boom case stays None, matching crossings.rs:969-975.
docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md no longer describes the boom tip as landing on the centreline or the far kerb in the drawn geometry.
cargo fmt -p cartopolis -p cartopolis_geo -p cartopolis_core -p cartopolis_simulator -p cartopolis_android --check is clean.

Verification

# Reproduce — this is the whole failure, and it needs no Bevy build.
cargo test -p cartopolis_geo crossings

# What CI's `test cartopolis` job runs (.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml:393).
cargo test --locked -j 6 --workspace --exclude cartopolis_android

# The last step of that job (ci.yml:540) — it runs after everything else,
# so a formatting slip does not hide behind anything.
cargo fmt -p cartopolis -p cartopolis_geo -p cartopolis_core \
          -p cartopolis_simulator -p cartopolis_android --check

No renderer check is needed: nothing this branch changes is drawn. Nothing here requires a workstation.

Watch the merge run, because a second cause of red is sitting behind this one. f9e457b (run 682, job 1275) failed for something else entirely — the flicker smoke was killed by its 15-minute step timeout (⚙️ [runner]: context deadline exceeded). It had already measured flicker_px=951 against a <=1500 gate and written its dump nine seconds earlier; what ran out of time was the shutdown, during which the watchdog logged MAIN LOOP STALLED — no frame for 2746 ms. The smokes have not run on main since, because the compile error ends the job before them. Once this branch merges they will run again and may fail the same way. That is a separate ticket, not this one — but a green test cartopolis on the PR lane does not by itself mean main will go green.

Out of scope

The flicker-smoke timeout on f9e457b described above. Do not raise timeout-minutes or loosen flicker_px on this branch.
Reverting either crossings change. The raised boom (#273) and the road-derived width (#274) are both wanted; only the tests that measure them are stale.
Any change to push_crossing, spec(), boom_span(), place_crossings_against or WayField.
Making CI catch this class of break — a merge-time cargo check --all-targets, or a rule that a branch must be rebased before merging. Worth a ticket; it is a workflow change, not this fix.
The 10 cm the full barrier lost (7.5 against a tabulated 7.6). crossings.rs:234-236 and the note already accept it.

Open questions

None.

Branch: test/276-crossings-tests-raised-boom

Original request

The last commit on main that CI ran for is 9e5ed895, and it did not pass:

test cartopolis — failure

Nothing can be deployed while this stands — tools/deploy-main gates on it — so this
comes before anything on the frontier.

Read the failing job's log, reproduce it locally, and fix the cause. If the failure is
the runner rather than the code (a flake, a cache miss, a missing tool), say so on this
ticket and close it rather than changing code to suit it.

_{Filed by the autopilot.}

_{🤖 Refined by the viberfox issue agent. Reply with @agent refine and what is wrong to have this rewritten.}

## Problem `main` at `9e5ed895` does not compile its test targets. The failing job is run 687, task 1075, job 1285; its log ends `🏁 Job failed` after: ``` error[E0308]: mismatched types --> crates/geo/src/crossings.rs:759:17 759 | let (mast_h, road_half, reach) = kind.spec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------- this expression has type `(f32, f32)` error[E0308]: mismatched types --> crates/geo/src/crossings.rs:813:13 error: could not compile `cartopolis_geo` (lib test) due to 2 previous errors ``` This is not a runner fault. It is a semantic merge conflict between two crossings branches that both passed on their own and were both cut from the same parent `a76cbbe`: - `0a9836d` (#273, "stand every level crossing's boom up") — raises the boom so its bands stack in **y** from `BOOM_Y` upward at a constant x beside the mast (`crates/geo/src/crossings.rs:431-453`), and adds the two tests at `crossings.rs:752` and `crossings.rs:811`. Green as a branch head (run 680). - `b2b9233` (#274, "size a level crossing for the road it bars") — splits `CrossingKind::spec()` from a 3-tuple into `(mast_h, fallback_half)` (`crossings.rs:220-225`) plus `boom_span() -> Option<f32>` (`crossings.rs:237-243`), and adds the `across()` measurement helper (`crossings.rs:500-531`) with four tests built on it. Green as a branch head (run 681). `git merge` joins them cleanly — they touch different regions of one file — and the result does not type-check. `cargo check` would not have caught it either: per `CLAUDE.md`, check does not compile `cfg(test)` code, and both new tests live in `#[cfg(test)] mod tests`. **The two compile errors are not the whole failure.** Once they are fixed, four tests will fail at runtime, because `across()` was written against the flat boom and now reads a raised one. `across()` picks the boom tip as the minimum x among vertices with `0.5 < y < 1.5` (`crossings.rs:525-529`). With the raised bar, every band sits at a constant `boom_x = mx - side * (MAST_HALF_W + BOOM_HALF_FACE)` (`crossings.rs:442`) and the lowest band's bottom face is at exactly `BOOM_Y` = 1.05 (`crossings.rs:102`, `crossings.rs:444`), which is inside that filter — so `tip` now measures a point ~0.24 m inboard of the mast rather than a reach across the road. The four affected assertions: | test | line | asserts | reads under the raised boom | |---|---|---|---| | `a_wide_road_gets_a_wide_crossing` | `crossings.rs:909` | tip ≈ 0.0 (centreline) | ≈ 5.63 | | `a_narrow_road_gets_a_narrow_crossing` | `crossings.rs:943` | tip ≈ 0.0 | ≈ 1.47 | | `a_full_barrier_reaches_the_far_kerb` | `crossings.rs:957` | tip ≈ −5.5 (far kerb) | ≈ 5.63 | | `an_unknown_width_falls_back_to_the_old_numbers` | `crossings.rs:979` | tip ≈ `mast_x − reach` | ≈ `mast_x − 0.37` | (Those right-hand numbers are arithmetic off the cited constants, not measurements — the suite run under Verification is what settles them.) Nothing outside the test module is broken: the only two `CrossingKind::spec()` call sites left in the tree are the two failing ones plus the correct `crossings.rs:385`, and `furniture.rs:1055`'s `spec()` is a different type's method. ## Approach One crate, one file, test module only: `crates/geo/src/crossings.rs` — plus one prose line in `docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md`. No production code should change; both landed behaviours are intended and neither is being undone. 1. **`a_raised_boom_stands_clear_of_the_road` (`crossings.rs:752-804`)** — take the two-tuple and get the reach from `boom_span()`, the same way `push_crossing` does at `crossings.rs:394-397`: ```rust let (mast_h, road_half) = kind.spec(); let reach = kind.boom_span().expect("a barrier form has a boom") * road_half + VERGE_M; ``` The rest of the test needs no change; it already measures the reach in y (`crossings.rs:779-784`). Its two hardcoded `0.5`s (`crossings.rs:789`) are `VERGE_M` (`crossings.rs:107`) and are worth naming while the lines are being touched. 2. **`a_lights_crossing_is_two_masts_and_two_lamps` (`crossings.rs:811-843`)** — same two-tuple destructure, and move the no-boom claim to `CrossingKind::Lights.boom_span().is_none()`. The `across = road_half + 0.5 + 0.30` at `crossings.rs:831` likewise reads better as `VERGE_M`. 3. **`across()` (`crossings.rs:500-531`)** — its `tip` no longer describes anything. The reach is now a bar *length*, read as the boom bands' maximum y above `BOOM_Y`, which is the idiom `a_raised_boom_stands_clear_of_the_road` already uses at `crossings.rs:768-771`. Return that instead of a horizontal tip, and rewrite the helper's doc comment (`crossings.rs:500-509`) to say what it measures now. Keep the mast half of it unchanged — that part still reads correctly. 4. **The four tests above** — restate each assertion in terms of the bar's length rather than where its tip lands, preserving the numbers #274 pinned: for a form with `boom_span() == s` on a road of half-width `h`, the reach is `s * h + VERGE_M`. That is `crossings.rs:227-236`'s own statement, and the fallback table at `crossings.rs:969-975` (4.0 / 2.1 / 7.5 / none) carries over unchanged. 5. **`docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md:196-200`** says a half barrier's boom "reaches back `half + 0.5` so its tip meets the centreline". That is the lowered attitude, and the same file's line 223 says the booms stand raised. Make it a length ("the bar is `half + 0.5` long, so it meets the centreline when lowered") so the two paragraphs stop contradicting each other. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] `cargo test -p cartopolis_geo` compiles and passes. - [ ] `cargo test --locked --workspace --exclude cartopolis_android` passes. - [ ] No `CrossingKind::spec()` call site destructures three elements: `grep -n '\.spec()' crates/geo/src/crossings.rs` shows only two-element bindings. - [ ] `push_crossing` (`crossings.rs:384-455`) and everything else outside `#[cfg(test)] mod tests` is byte-identical to `9e5ed895`, except for the note edit — `git diff main -- crates/geo/src/crossings.rs` touches nothing above `crossings.rs:484`. - [ ] Both behaviours that landed are still asserted: a test fails if the boom is laid flat again, and a test fails if the installation stops being sized from `LevelCrossing::road_half`. - [ ] The fallback reaches stay 4.0 / 2.1 / 7.5 m and the no-boom case stays `None`, matching `crossings.rs:969-975`. - [ ] `docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md` no longer describes the boom tip as landing on the centreline or the far kerb in the drawn geometry. - [ ] `cargo fmt -p cartopolis -p cartopolis_geo -p cartopolis_core -p cartopolis_simulator -p cartopolis_android --check` is clean. ## Verification ```bash # Reproduce — this is the whole failure, and it needs no Bevy build. cargo test -p cartopolis_geo crossings # What CI's `test cartopolis` job runs (.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml:393). cargo test --locked -j 6 --workspace --exclude cartopolis_android # The last step of that job (ci.yml:540) — it runs after everything else, # so a formatting slip does not hide behind anything. cargo fmt -p cartopolis -p cartopolis_geo -p cartopolis_core \ -p cartopolis_simulator -p cartopolis_android --check ``` No renderer check is needed: nothing this branch changes is drawn. Nothing here requires a workstation. **Watch the merge run, because a second cause of red is sitting behind this one.** `f9e457b` (run 682, job 1275) failed for something else entirely — the flicker smoke was killed by its 15-minute step timeout (`⚙️ [runner]: context deadline exceeded`). It had already measured `flicker_px=951` against a `<=1500` gate and written its dump nine seconds earlier; what ran out of time was the shutdown, during which the watchdog logged `MAIN LOOP STALLED — no frame for 2746 ms`. The smokes have not run on `main` since, because the compile error ends the job before them. Once this branch merges they will run again and may fail the same way. That is a separate ticket, not this one — but a green `test cartopolis` on the PR lane does not by itself mean `main` will go green. ## Out of scope - The flicker-smoke timeout on `f9e457b` described above. Do not raise `timeout-minutes` or loosen `flicker_px` on this branch. - Reverting either crossings change. The raised boom (#273) and the road-derived width (#274) are both wanted; only the tests that measure them are stale. - Any change to `push_crossing`, `spec()`, `boom_span()`, `place_crossings_against` or `WayField`. - Making CI catch this class of break — a merge-time `cargo check --all-targets`, or a rule that a branch must be rebased before merging. Worth a ticket; it is a workflow change, not this fix. - The 10 cm the full barrier lost (7.5 against a tabulated 7.6). `crossings.rs:234-236` and the note already accept it. ## Open questions None. --- Branch: `test/276-crossings-tests-raised-boom` <details><summary>Original request</summary> The last commit on `main` that CI ran for is `9e5ed895`, and it did not pass: - `test cartopolis` — failure Nothing can be deployed while this stands — `tools/deploy-main` gates on it — so this comes before anything on the frontier. Read the failing job's log, reproduce it locally, and fix the cause. If the failure is the runner rather than the code (a flake, a cache miss, a missing tool), say so on this ticket and close it rather than changing code to suit it. Filed by the autopilot.  </details> 🤖 Refined by the viberfox issue agent. Reply with **@agent refine** and what is wrong to have this rewritten.

viberfox-agent added the

labels

2026-09-02 08:46:33 +00:00

viberfox-agent added this to the Viberfox project

2026-09-02 08:46:57 +00:00

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 08:47:00 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

🤖 Refining this before anything gets built — reading the code, no branch, no commits. If it turns out I'd have to guess at the requirements I'll stop and ask instead.

viberfox-agent added

agent:refined

and removed

agent:refining

labels

2026-09-02 08:52:06 +00:00

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 08:52:06 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

🤖 Refined. The description above is now the spec; I'll pick it up for implementation on the next poll.

If the direction is wrong, say so now — @agent refine with a correction rewrites it, and agent:skip stops me.

_{🤖 viberfox issue agent on the VPS — 39 turns · $3.33 · session 05deabe2-824c-4657-ba60-3713735d9c12. Reply with @agent to continue this session.}

🤖 **Refined.** The description above is now the spec; I'll pick it up for implementation on the next poll. If the direction is wrong, say so now — **@agent refine** with a correction rewrites it, and `agent:skip` stops me. --- 🤖 viberfox issue agent on the VPS — 39 turns · $3.33 · session `05deabe2-824c-4657-ba60-3713735d9c12`. Reply with **@agent** to continue this session.

viberfox-agent added

agent:running

and removed

agent:refined

labels

2026-09-02 08:52:29 +00:00

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 08:52:32 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

🤖 Picked this up — working on branch test/276-crossings-tests-raised-boom in a fresh worktree on the VPS. I'll report back here when I'm done.

_{Label an issue agent:skip to keep me off it, or driven to keep it in a session you are driving.}

🤖 Picked this up — working on branch `test/276-crossings-tests-raised-boom` in a fresh worktree on the VPS. I'll report back here when I'm done. Label an issue `agent:skip` to keep me off it, or `driven` to keep it in a session you are driving.

viberfox-agent referenced this issue from a commit

2026-09-02 09:26:50 +00:00

test(geo): measure a crossing's boom as a length, not a tip

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 09:27:18 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

main builds and tests again. Here is the report.

Fixed the test module in crates/geo/src/crossings.rs. It was the only thing broken — no production code was changed, and neither of the two behaviours that landed has been undone.

What was wrong. Two branches merged cleanly into a tree that does not compile. One raised the level crossing's boom so it stands up beside the mast; the other changed CrossingKind::spec() to return two numbers instead of three. Two tests still asked for three, which is the compile error CI reported. Behind it, four more tests would have failed at run time: the test helper across() located the boom by looking for the lowest point across the road between 0.5 m and 1.5 m up, which describes a bar lying flat. With the bar standing up, that filter found a point a few centimetres inboard of the mast instead.

What I changed.

The two tests now take the two-value spec() and get the boom's reach from boom_span(), the same way the drawing code does.
across() now reports the bar's length — the top of the boom bands above the 1.05 m pivot — instead of where a tip lands. It picks the bands out by the bar's inner face being the most inboard part of an installation: 0.37 m in from the mast centre, against the lamp head's 0.30 m. A form with no boom still answers "none" for free.
The four affected tests assert the same numbers the width change pinned, restated as lengths: 6.0 m of bar on an 11 m road, 1.6 m on a cycleway, 11.5 m for a full barrier, and 4.0 / 2.1 / 7.5 m or none where the road's width is unknown.
Replaced four hardcoded 0.5s with the existing VERGE_M constant while those lines were open.
docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md said a half barrier's boom "reaches back so its tip meets the centreline" two paragraphs before saying the booms stand raised. It now states a bar length.

How I verified it. cargo test -p cartopolis_geo crossings — 19 passed. cargo test --locked -j 6 --workspace --exclude cartopolis_android — 1283 passed, 0 failed, exit code 0. cargo fmt over the five owned crates is clean. git diff origin/main -- crates/geo/src/crossings.rs touches nothing above line 497, so everything outside #[cfg(test)] mod tests is byte-identical to 9e5ed895.

Nothing here is drawn, so no visual check is needed anywhere.

Two things for you.

The git administration directory for the worktree I was given (.claude/worktrees/test__276-crossings-tests-raised-boom) disappeared partway through the session — every git command from inside it started answering not a git repository: (null). I committed and pushed from a second worktree at .claude/worktrees/276-repair instead. The branch is pushed and correct; the two worktree directories are just clutter to remove when convenient.
As the ticket warned, a green run on this branch does not guarantee a green main. The picture-comparison smoke test last failed on f9e457b by running out of time during shutdown, and it has not run since because the compile error ended the job before it. Once this merges it will run again and may fail that way. That is a separate ticket.

No commits were made.

_{🤖 viberfox issue agent on the VPS — 53 turns · $4.61 · session b3eb6026-a907-4353-8776-559380c4f118. Reply with @agent to continue this session.}

`main` builds and tests again. Here is the report. --- Fixed the test module in `crates/geo/src/crossings.rs`. It was the only thing broken — no production code was changed, and neither of the two behaviours that landed has been undone. **What was wrong.** Two branches merged cleanly into a tree that does not compile. One raised the level crossing's boom so it stands up beside the mast; the other changed `CrossingKind::spec()` to return two numbers instead of three. Two tests still asked for three, which is the compile error CI reported. Behind it, four more tests would have failed at run time: the test helper `across()` located the boom by looking for the lowest point across the road between 0.5 m and 1.5 m up, which describes a bar lying flat. With the bar standing up, that filter found a point a few centimetres inboard of the mast instead. **What I changed.** - The two tests now take the two-value `spec()` and get the boom's reach from `boom_span()`, the same way the drawing code does. - `across()` now reports the bar's **length** — the top of the boom bands above the 1.05 m pivot — instead of where a tip lands. It picks the bands out by the bar's inner face being the most inboard part of an installation: 0.37 m in from the mast centre, against the lamp head's 0.30 m. A form with no boom still answers "none" for free. - The four affected tests assert the same numbers the width change pinned, restated as lengths: 6.0 m of bar on an 11 m road, 1.6 m on a cycleway, 11.5 m for a full barrier, and 4.0 / 2.1 / 7.5 m or none where the road's width is unknown. - Replaced four hardcoded `0.5`s with the existing `VERGE_M` constant while those lines were open. - `docs/notes/prorail-level-crossings.md` said a half barrier's boom "reaches back so its tip meets the centreline" two paragraphs before saying the booms stand raised. It now states a bar length. **How I verified it.** `cargo test -p cartopolis_geo crossings` — 19 passed. `cargo test --locked -j 6 --workspace --exclude cartopolis_android` — 1283 passed, 0 failed, exit code 0. `cargo fmt` over the five owned crates is clean. `git diff origin/main -- crates/geo/src/crossings.rs` touches nothing above line 497, so everything outside `#[cfg(test)] mod tests` is byte-identical to `9e5ed895`. Nothing here is drawn, so no visual check is needed anywhere. **Two things for you.** 1. The git administration directory for the worktree I was given (`.claude/worktrees/test__276-crossings-tests-raised-boom`) disappeared partway through the session — every `git` command from inside it started answering `not a git repository: (null)`. I committed and pushed from a second worktree at `.claude/worktrees/276-repair` instead. The branch is pushed and correct; the two worktree directories are just clutter to remove when convenient. 2. As the ticket warned, a green run on this branch does not guarantee a green `main`. The picture-comparison smoke test last failed on `f9e457b` by running out of time during shutdown, and it has not run since because the compile error ended the job before it. Once this merges it will run again and may fail that way. That is a separate ticket. _No commits were made._ --- 🤖 viberfox issue agent on the VPS — 53 turns · $4.61 · session `b3eb6026-a907-4353-8776-559380c4f118`. Reply with **@agent** to continue this session.

viberfox-agent added

agent:done

and removed

agent:running

labels

2026-09-02 09:27:18 +00:00

viberfox-agent referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-09-02 09:31:34 +00:00

main is red on 9e5ed895 #277

viberfox-agent

2026-09-02 09:41:43 +00:00

closed this issue
added
agent:shipped
and removed
ship
labels

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 09:41:43 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

🤖 Merged into main as pull request #277 (a1d489de).

🤖 **Merged into `main`** as pull request #277 (`a1d489de`).

viberfox-agent commented

2026-09-02 10:06:43 +00:00

Author

Collaborator

🤖 Deployed to the public services.

[1mmain is at 0b63cd7d[0m
  waiting for CI on 0b63cd7d
  success    wasm & android targets
  success    test cartopolis

[1mdispatching the simulator[0m
  run 699 started
  the simulator: success

[1mverifying the running simulator (expecting protocol 21)[0m
  serving protocol 21

[1mdispatching the web client[0m
  run 700 started
  the web client: success

[1mdeployed 0b63cd7d[0m

🤖 **Deployed to the public services.** ``` [1mmain is at 0b63cd7d[0m waiting for CI on 0b63cd7d success wasm & android targets success test cartopolis [1mdispatching the simulator[0m run 699 started the simulator: success [1mverifying the running simulator (expecting protocol 21)[0m serving protocol 21 [1mdispatching the web client[0m run 700 started the web client: success [1mdeployed 0b63cd7d[0m ```

viberfox-agent referenced this issue

2026-09-03 00:47:47 +00:00

Autopilot log #257

viberfox-agent referenced this issue

2026-09-03 00:47:51 +00:00

QA: what #276 shipped — main is red on 9e5ed895 #278

viberfox-agent referenced this issue

2026-09-03 00:56:06 +00:00

gap: you walk and drive straight through a level crossing #234

viberfox-agent referenced this issue

2026-09-03 00:56:06 +00:00

gap: with the height layer on, every floating navigation mark sinks #268