gap: the geografische namen row's "11 names in 4.7 KB" is one collection of five, and not the one carrying the settlements #240
Labels
No labels
agent
agent:ci
agent:done
agent:failed
agent:needs-input
agent:refined
agent:refining
agent:running
agent:shipped
agent:skip
autonomous
autopilot
driven
local
plan
proposal
qa
qa-gap
research
retro
ship
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
jeroen/cartopolis#240
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
#201's commit body states the standard the rows were held to: "Each row here wasrequested over HTTP from this container and the response read: the source exists,
answers, and returns what the row claims." For the geografische namen row
(
docs/direction.md:91) the first two hold and the third does not — the measurementis real, but it was taken on one collection out of five, and it is not the collection
that carries the content the row promises.
The row. "The official name register — settlements, districts, water bodies and
named buildings, each with geometry and a type — which is what could be named above
street level, where the street labels stop and nothing is written on the map at all:
11 names in 4.7 KB over a Groningen cell."
What I did. Found the endpoint
(
https://api.pdok.nl/kadaster/brt-geografische-namen/ogc/v1, which is the one the rownames) and requested every collection over the z14 cell covering the Groningen centre
—
8490/5320,bbox=6.54785,53.21261,6.56982,53.22577— then over a box covering theprovince to see what each one carries.
What happened. The 4.7 KB reproduces exactly, on
namedplace_point:namedplace_pointnamedplace_linestringnamedplace_multipolygonnamedplace_polygon_overignamedplace_polygon_wegdelenTwo things follow.
The measured collection does not contain what the row promises. All 11 points in
that cell are
local_type: Gebouwen. Over the whole province boxnamedplace_pointreturns 297 features and not one settlement, district or water body:
{Inrichtingselementen: 208, Functionelegebieden: 51, Gebouwen: 38}. The settlementsand districts are in
namedplace_multipolygon— where the three features over one z14cell are
Vesting Groningen,GroningenandNederland, the last being thenational outline dragged through every cell that touches it; the
Groningenplacepolygon alone is 111 KB of coordinates.
A third of the weight is a layer that already ships.
namedplace_polygon_wegdelenis 750 features and 489.5 KB of street names, and
systems::street_labelsalreadydraws those from OSM as world geometry. That is the part of the register the row
explicitly says it is not for — "above street level, where the street labels stop".
What a user would expect. Rows are consumed top-down and
#201ordered themdeliberately; a stated cost is what the maintainer ranks by and what the next session
sizes its ticket against.
4.7 KBreads as the cheapest row in the table. The contentthe row is actually asking for costs ~910 KB per cell (the two polygon collections
that hold the settlements, districts and water), which puts it in the same bracket as
the rows already recorded as not worth it for exactly this reason —
Perceelat 14 MBa cell, CBS at 89% table — and value 5 says the frame budget is not negotiable.
That does not settle whether the row should be taken. The point collection is real,
cheap and does carry named buildings and functional areas, and a per-collection ticket
is a reasonable shape. But the row as written would have that decided against a figure
300× under the thing it describes.
Where the seam is.
docs/direction.md:91. The fix is a corrected row, not code —either the figure restated per collection, or the promise narrowed to the points that
the 4.7 KB actually buys.
Filed by the QA lane against #238.
docs/qa/targets.md— 14 of 14 passes re-verified a shipped ticket, 9 of them documentation-only verdicts #280